It is now well established that CRT improves patient quality of life, decreases hospitalization for acute heart failure and most importantly decreases overall mortality2. However, benefits at the individual level vary considerably. Depending on the definition, the response to CRT is positive in only around 50-80% of patients, leaving 20-50% without any significant effect3.
In particular, optimizing the position of the LV lead can significantly increase the rate of responders to CRT (83% vs. 65%, as described in the TARGET study4). As opposed to RA and RV leads, LV lead positioning is a particularly difficult and long procedure, as it is placed in the coronary venous system coursing along the left ventricle, through narrow and tortuous veins, whose anatomy can vary significantly from one patient to another.